Teacher: Rusty Kennedy Series: Acts |
Rusty's Notes | |
- With Paul home in Tarsus, the narrative focuses once more on Peter.
- He last appeared in connection with the Samaritan mission (8:14–25).
- 1) Someone being healed is a pretty big deal!
- 2) Someone raising from the dead is even a bigger deal.
- 3) Someone coming to salvation in Christ is the biggest deal!
Acts 9
THE HEALING OF AENEAS
32 As Peter was traveling from place to place (itinerant ministry), he also came down to the saints who lived in Lydda.
- Believers in Lydda possibly because Phillip passed through to Caesarea. (Acts 8:40)
- The Christians are referred to as “saints” in both accounts (vv. 34, 41), a point the NIV obscures by using “believers” in v. 41.
- “Saints” is a rather rare designation for believers in Acts.[1]
- Peter took the initiative.
- Peter’s first miracle was healing a crippled man in Acts 3.
- Who healed Aeneas? Jesus
- What healed Aeneas? Faith in Jesus
- “make your bed” – Couch or mat – Similar to what they would have prepared for dining at the table.
- Indicating Aeneas had retained enough sustenance to regain his strength.
- Lydda was located in the fertile coastal plain of Sharon, which extends north from Joppa to Mt. Carmel.[2]
DORCAS RESTORED TO LIFE
36 In Joppa
- modern Joffa in Tel Aviv, 10 miles west of Lydda)
- Same place Jonah fled to when escaping God after he was told to go to Ninevah.
- But also the same place Peter receives his calling to go to the Gentiles.
- When the Church body loses a helpful saint, it greatly impacts the fellowship.
- Today, marks the month of one year without Todd Dolbeer.
- It was Jewish custom to wash the body and prepare for with spices for burial.
- At this point, the apostles had never raised anyone from the dead… only Jesus.
- So why call Peter? Because of their faith in Jesus.
- Who had the greater authority? The people? Or Peter?
- Tabitha/Dorcas cared for the widows.
- The account of Peter’s raising of Dorcas should be compared with the account of our Lord’s raising of Jairus’ daughter (Mark 5:34–43).
- In both cases, the mourning people were put out of the room; and the words spoken are almost identical: “talitha cumi: little girl, arise; Tabitha cumi: Tabitha, arise.”
- Jesus took the girl by the hand before He spoke to her, for He was not afraid of becoming ceremonially defiled.
- Peter took Dorcas by the hand after she had come to life.
- In both instances, it was the power of God that raised the person from the dead, for the dead person certainly could not exercise faith.[3]
- Peter copied exactly what Jesus had taught him.
- The distinction between saints and widows is only the fact that Tabitha/Dorcas ministered specifically to the widows and they were the most grateful of all the saints.
- It is significant that Peter stayed in the home of a tanner, because tanners were considered “unclean” by the Jewish rabbis (see Lev. 11:35–40).
- God was moving Peter a step at a time from Jewish legalism into the freedom of His wonderful grace.
CORNELIUS’S VISION
Acts 10
- We see Peter using “the keys of the kingdom” for the third and last time.
- He had opened the door of faith for the Jews (Acts 2)
- and also for the Samaritans (Acts 8),
- and now he would be used of God to bring the Gentiles into the church (see Gal. 3:27–28; Eph. 2:11–22).
- This event took place about ten years after Pentecost. (Roughly 40 AD)[5]
- The Gentile mission was not an easy step for the Jewish Christians to take.
- It involved two major issues.
- 1) The question of whether Gentiles had to become Jews in order to become Christians, i.e., should they undergo Jewish proselyte procedure when they were converted to Christianity?
- This would have required the circumcision of male converts and the adoption for all converts of such Jewish legal distinctives as the kosher food laws.
- Because God granted the gift of the Spirit to the Gentiles in Cornelius’s home without their subscribing to proselyte procedure, Peter became convinced that such Jewish conversion procedures were not necessary for the Christian mission to the Gentiles (cf. 15:7–11).
- The second major issue involved the question of table fellowship between Jewish and Gentile Christians.
- Since Gentiles did not follow kosher practices, Jewish Christians like Peter were exposed to a real situation of compromise when they associated with them.
- Both questions were answered for Peter in the experience with Cornelius because he was convinced that God accepted Gentiles without circumcision and that he could himself in good faith enjoy table fellowship with his Gentile-Christian brothers and sisters.
- The issues were not, however, fully settled for the Jewish Christians as a whole.
- Both issues resurfaced at the Jerusalem Conference (chap. 15) after Paul and Barnabas’s successful mission to the Gentiles, and a compromise solution was agreed upon at that time.
- Acts 10:1–11:18 is the longest single narrative in all of Acts. This in itself witnesses to the great importance Luke placed on the incident.
- Caesarea is sixty-five miles northwest of Jerusalem and thirty miles north of Joppa (Jaffa).
- At that time, Caesarea was the Roman capital of Judea and boasted of many beautiful public buildings.
- Caesarea was a Hellenistic-style city with a dominant population of Gentiles.
- Originally a small town named Strato’s Tower, it was rebuilt on a grand style by Herod the Great, complete with a man-made harbor, a theater, an amphitheater, a hippodrome, and a temple dedicated to Caesar.[6]
- Show 1st minute of Israel ’18 Video.
- Cornelius, the Roman centurion, whose heart had tired of pagan myths and empty religious rituals, and who had turned to Judaism in hopes he could find salvation.
- Cornelius was as close to Judaism as he could get without becoming a proselyte.[7]
- Cornelius was keeping one of the three traditional Jewish times of prayer, the afternoon hour of 3 p.m., which coincided with the Tamid sacrifice in the temple.[8]
The angel told him, “Your prayers and your acts of charity have ascended as a memorial offering before God.
- Cornelius’ sacrifice of prayer & charity were pleasing to the Lord.
7 When the angel who spoke to him had gone, he called two of his household servants and a devout soldier, who was one of those who attended him.
- Somewhat secretive but also needed men he could trust.
PETER’S VISION
9 The next day, as they were traveling and nearing the city, Peter went up to pray on the roof about noon. 10 He became hungry and wanted to eat, but while they were preparing something, he fell into a trance.
- Noon was not the normal eating time, mid-morning and mid-afternoon were.
- So Peter might have missed the mid-morning brunch.
- 3 meals a day was not normal until the industrial revolution (1700’s)
- Roofs were often covered with awnings. Perhaps that or the glimpse of a distant sail at sea provided the vehicle for the vision Peter had.
14 “No, Lord!” Peter said. “For I have never eaten anything impure and ritually unclean.”
- What the voice requested was strictly against the law.
- Never had he eaten anything defiled and unclean.
- The voice ignored his protest, reissuing the command and adding, “Do not call anything impure that God has made clean.”
- The command came three times; each time Peter objected and fell into further confusion.
- It is simply not possible to fully accept someone with whom you are unwilling to share in the intimacy of table fellowship.
- The early church had to solve the problem of kosher food laws in order to launch a mission to the Gentiles.[9]
[1] Polhill, J. B. (1992). Acts (Vol. 26, p. 246). Nashville: Broadman & Holman Publishers.
[2] Polhill, J. B. (1992). Acts (Vol. 26, p. 246). Nashville: Broadman & Holman Publishers.
[3] Wiersbe, W. W. (1996). The Bible exposition commentary (Vol. 1, p. 444). Wheaton, IL: Victor Books.
[4] Christian Standard Bible. (2017). (Ac 9:1–43). Nashville, TN: Holman Bible Publishers.
[5] Wiersbe, W. W. (1996). The Bible exposition commentary (Vol. 1, p. 444). Wheaton, IL: Victor Books.
[6] Polhill, J. B. (1992). Acts (Vol. 26, p. 252). Nashville: Broadman & Holman Publishers.
[7] Wiersbe, W. W. (1996). The Bible exposition commentary (Vol. 1, pp. 444–445). Wheaton, IL: Victor Books.
[8] Polhill, J. B. (1992). Acts (Vol. 26, pp. 252–253). Nashville: Broadman & Holman Publishers.
[9] Polhill, J. B. (1992). Acts (Vol. 26, p. 256). Nashville: Broadman & Holman Publishers.