Teacher: Rusty Kennedy Series: Acts |
Rusty's Notes | |
HEALING OF A LAME MAN
1 Now Peter and John were going up to the temple for the time of prayer at three in the afternoon.
- Peter did all the speaking and acting, with John merely standing in the background.
- John’s presence is sometimes explained as based on the Jewish law that at least two witnesses are necessary to confirm any testimony (2 Cor 13:1).
- The practice may be traced to Jesus’ sending his disciples out on mission by pairs (Luke 10:1), a practice that still retains its wisdom and validity.
- John was his intern?
- Peter and John are often found together in Scripture.
- They were partners in the fishing business (Luke 5:10); they prepared the last Passover for Jesus (Luke 22:8); they ran to the tomb on the first Easter Sunday morning (John 20:3–4); and they ministered to the Samaritans who believed on Jesus Christ (Acts 8:14).
- Now that they were filled with the Holy Spirit, the Apostles were no longer competing for greatness, but were at last working faithfully together to build the church (Ps. 133).[1]
- There were various accesses to the temple, some of which involved a descent.
- Whether one actually ascended or descended to the temple, the customary idiom was to “go up” for worship there.
- The time of the apostles’ visit was the “ninth” hour, three in the afternoon, i.e., the hour of prayer.
- It was also the time of the evening Tamid, one of the two sacrifices held daily in the temple.
- These had become prescribed times of prayer, and people would come to the temple at the sacrifice times to observe the ceremony and pray.
- The largest crowds would thus have been found at the times of sacrifice, as Peter and John must have been well aware; for they went to the temple for prayer and for witness.[2]
- The rabbis taught that there were three pillars for the Jewish faith—the Torah, worship, and the showing of kindness, or charity.
- Alms giving was one of the main ways to show kindness and was thus considered a major expression of one’s devotion to God.
- With their minds set on worship, those who entered the temple for the evening sacrifice and prayer would be particularly disposed to practice their piety by generously giving alms to a lame beggar.[3]
- Almost placed there as “an opportunity”
- This man had been lame for over 40 years according to Acts 4:22.
- This sounded like a broken record.
- Repeated his begging hundreds of times a day for years.
- The beggar gave them his total attention.
- He expected something in return.
- They had already given their resources to the community in Acts 2:44-45
- To invoke the name of Jesus is to call upon his authority and power.
- In a real sense, then, Jesus through Peter continued his healing ministry.
- With a healing touch common to miracle narratives, Peter grasped the man’s right hand and lifted him up.
- It is almost as if at this point the man needed all the encouragement he could get.11
- The man felt the new strength surging through his feet and ankles.
- He jumped to his feet and began to walk.
- With his increasing awareness of the miracle that had happened to him, he entered the sanctuary with Peter and John.
- Before, as the lame beggar, he sat in the court of the Gentiles at the gate to the sanctuary.
- Day by day he sat there at the threshold to the place of worship, but he could not enter.
- He was lame, blemished, and denied access to the inner courts (cf. Lev 21:17–20; 2 Sam 5:8).
- At this time not only had he received physical healing, but he had found spiritual acceptance as well.
- For the first time he was deemed worthy to enter the house of worship.
- This theme will repeat itself in Acts.
- Those who were rejected as unworthy for worship in the old religion of Israel found full acceptance in the name of Jesus, whether a lame beggar, an Ethiopian eunuch, a woman, or a Gentile.[4]
- Luke (the narrator) has already established the familiarity of local people with the once lame, but now healed, man.
- The people in the temple clearly grasped that a miracle had taken place; there was no doubt about its authenticity.[5]
PREACHING IN SOLOMON’S COLONNADE
11 While he was holding on to Peter and John, all the people, utterly astonished, ran toward them in what is called Solomon’s Colonnade.
- Show Map of the Temple
- A shaded area along the eastern wall of the Court of the Gentiles. It was used for commerce, teaching, and conversation. Acts later records that Christians sometimes gathered there (5:12).[6]
- This was just about 8 weeks ago.
- In his sermon at Pentecost, Peter had to refute the accusation that the believers were drunk.
- In this sermon, he had to refute the notion that he and John had healed the man by their own power.
- (Paul and Barnabas would face a similar situation after healing a lame man. See Acts 14:8–18.)
- Peter immediately identified the source of the miracle—Jesus Christ, the Son of God.
- Wisely, Peter said that this was the God of their fathers, the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob.[7]
- As at Pentecost, Peter was addressing people who knew the Scriptures and were acquainted with the recent events in Jerusalem (see Luke 24:18).
- It was not a group of ignorant pagans with no religious background.[8]
- There must be conviction before a sinner can experience conversion.
- Unless a patient is convinced that he is sick, he will never accept the diagnosis or take the treatment.
- Peter turned the temple into a courtroom and laid all the evidence out for everybody to see.
- How could two ordinary fishermen perform such a great miracle unless God was with them?
- Nobody would dare deny the miracle because the beggar stood there before them all in “perfect soundness” (Acts 3:16; 4:14).
- To accept the miracle would have been to admit that Jesus Christ is indeed the living Son of God and that His name has power.[9]
- But Peter did not leave the people without hope.
- In fact, he almost seemed to defend them by pointing out that they had acted in ignorance (Acts 3:17) while at the same time they had fulfilled the Word of God (Acts 3:18).
- In the Old Testament Law, there is a difference between deliberate sins and sins of ignorance (see Lev. 4–5; Num. 15:22–31).
- The person who sinned presumptuously was a rebel against God and was guilty of great sin.
- He was to be “cut off” from his people (Num. 15:30–31), which could mean excommunication and even death.
- The defiant “high-handed” sinner was condemned, but the person who sinned unwittingly and without deliberate intent was given opportunity to repent and seek God’s forgiveness.
- Ignorance does not remove the sinner’s guilt, but it does mitigate the circumstances.[10]
- The call to repentance is always included in the gospel message.
- Acts emphasizes the essential place of repentance in embracing the salvation Christ offers. See 2:38.[11]
24 “In addition, all the prophets who have spoken, from Samuel and those after him, have also foretold these days. 25 You are the sons of the prophets and of the covenant that God made with your ancestors, saying to Abraham, And all the families of the earth will be blessed through your offspring. 26 God raised up his servant and sent him first to you to bless you by turning each of you from your evil ways.”[12]
- Having announced the crime, presented the evidence, and explained the nature of their sin, Peter then offered them pardon!
- What a strange thing for the prosecuting attorney to become the defense attorney and the pardoning judge!
- Peter’s burden was to encourage his people to trust Christ and experience His gracious salvation.[13]
- What Peter was concerned to do was to convince his Jewish hearers that God’s covenant with Abraham was fully realized in Jesus.[14]
- What was true for the Jews in Solomon’s Colonnade still holds true today.
- Only in receiving the Christ of God by repentance and turning to him is there forgiveness, refreshing, and restoration.[15]
- It may have taken the apostles some time to fully realize the implications of the missionary imperative, but there it is.
- Peter was primarily concerned with the Jews.
- The gospel was preached to them first.
[1] Wiersbe, W. W. (1996). The Bible exposition commentary (Vol. 1, p. 412). Wheaton, IL: Victor Books.
[2] Polhill, J. B. (1992). Acts (Vol. 26, p. 125). Nashville: Broadman & Holman Publishers.
[3] Polhill, J. B. (1992). Acts (Vol. 26, p. 126). Nashville: Broadman & Holman Publishers.
[4] Polhill, J. B. (1992). Acts (Vol. 26, p. 128). Nashville: Broadman & Holman Publishers.
[5] Barry, J. D., Mangum, D., Brown, D. R., Heiser, M. S., Custis, M., Ritzema, E., … Bomar, D. (2012, 2016). Faithlife Study Bible (Ac 3:10). Bellingham, WA: Lexham Press.
[6] Barry, J. D., Mangum, D., Brown, D. R., Heiser, M. S., Custis, M., Ritzema, E., … Bomar, D. (2012, 2016). Faithlife Study Bible (Ac 3:11). Bellingham, WA: Lexham Press.
[7] Wiersbe, W. W. (1996). The Bible exposition commentary (Vol. 1, p. 412). Wheaton, IL: Victor Books.
[8] Wiersbe, W. W. (1996). The Bible exposition commentary (Vol. 1, p. 413). Wheaton, IL: Victor Books.
[9] Wiersbe, W. W. (1996). The Bible exposition commentary (Vol. 1, p. 413). Wheaton, IL: Victor Books.
[10] Wiersbe, W. W. (1996). The Bible exposition commentary (Vol. 1, p. 413). Wheaton, IL: Victor Books.
[11] Barry, J. D., Mangum, D., Brown, D. R., Heiser, M. S., Custis, M., Ritzema, E., … Bomar, D. (2012, 2016). Faithlife Study Bible (Ac 3:19). Bellingham, WA: Lexham Press.
[12] Christian Standard Bible. (2017). (Ac 3:1–26). Nashville, TN: Holman Bible Publishers.
[13] Wiersbe, W. W. (1996). The Bible exposition commentary (Vol. 1, p. 413). Wheaton, IL: Victor Books.
[14] Polhill, J. B. (1992). Acts (Vol. 26, p. 137). Nashville: Broadman & Holman Publishers.
[15] Polhill, J. B. (1992). Acts (Vol. 26, p. 135). Nashville: Broadman & Holman Publishers.
[16] Polhill, J. B. (1992). Acts (Vol. 26, p. 137). Nashville: Broadman & Holman Publishers.